- From: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:13:14 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>, "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Charles, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > ... >> >> It could be used in HTTP in RDF and elsewhere. > > What is the use case? In fact, Johannes and I want to break a W3C Note-writing record, and we could not think of something else :-) Seriously, I think that we are not consistent if we have on one side an earl:uri property for things like WebContent, and on the other hand, we have all the possibilities to decompose a URI in the HTTP in RDF when using the http:GetRequest, for instance. With that URI class and its properties, we may have a consistent way of expressing *any URI*, with the different schemes, and reuse it in the HTTP note. But maybe, it is only me who starts to have fun with namespaces ... regards, carlos -- Dr Carlos A Velasco - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)] Barrierefreie Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie für Alle Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:14:13 UTC