RE: Some doubts about the Schema

> There is no dc:location, and if we publish 
> implying there is (having noticed our
> mistake) then we are behaving in a fairly anti-social manner. 
> It is only listed now as an optional property in a table 
> (lucky - when we had those in the schema publishing the 
> schema as RDF would have effectively created a rogue dc 
> element). So I believe we should either agree to drop it 
> before publication, or should delay publication until we have 
> resolved a replacement.

I agree with Charles on this.

Regards,

CI.

Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 14:24:22 UTC