mode "mixed"

Hi folks,

as I understand it, this is meant to cover the use case where an assertion  
is made by a person and/or tool, but there is no atomic information about  
who did what - e.g. 1000 pages were tested by some organisation using  
Bobby and some human tests, and the results are mode mixed rather than  
identifying that result X was the person, result Y the tool, etc.

So where you want to be explicit that a person verified something, having  
been guided by a tool, and is actually responsible for the entire result,  
you would use

Assertion
   mode manual
   assertedBy
     CompoundAssertor
       mainAssertor
         foaf:Person chaals
       helpAssertor
         earl:Software hera
...

Does this tally with what everyone remembers?

This issue is noted in the new schema draft at  
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20060101#testmode -  
thanks Shadi for publishing it.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile                     chaals@opera.com
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
      Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/

Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 19:41:21 UTC