On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:39:50 +0100, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > During the previous teleconference meeting we brainstormed further > option and came up with the following alternatives: > 7. value > 8. label > 9. output > 10. rating > However, we decided that earl:outcome was still the best option and > decided to adopt it unless someone comes up with a better suggestion. If > you have concerns about the new term earl:outcome, then please send a > rationale and alternate suggestions to the ERT list by 10 January 2007. Sigh. Well, the outcome seems reasonable enough to me. Cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.comReceived on Thursday, 21 December 2006 15:33:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:52:53 UTC