- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:39:50 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Dear Group,
During the previous teleconference meeting we brainstormed further
option and came up with the following alternatives:
7. value
8. label
9. output
10. rating
However, we decided that earl:outcome was still the best option and
decided to adopt it unless someone comes up with a better suggestion. If
you have concerns about the new term earl:outcome, then please send a
rationale and alternate suggestions to the ERT list by 10 January 2007.
Regards,
Shadi
David Rooks wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As per my action item, i have been looking at alternatives to
> earl:validity and have come up with (IMO) 2 good options...
>
> 1. executionResult
> 2. outcome
>
> A few other options which i don't think are quite as good are...
>
> 3. conclusion
> 4. analysis
> 5. assessment
> 6. evaluation
>
> My personal preference is option 2.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
>
>
>
--
Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 11:40:00 UTC