- From: Nils Ulltveit-Moe <nils@u-moe.no>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:08:45 +0200
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Shadi, We can probably use the lang attribute to the earl:TestSubject. The use case is that our pool of assessment modules parse the (X)HTML pages that we want to perform automatic assessments on. We would like harvest information about the content language of the page being assessed for statistical analysis in a data warehouse, and we would like to utilise the fact that the assessment module already had this information available. Best regards, Nils Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > > Right. I bow before you humbly. ;) > > The correct way would be to do this in the dc:description of the > earl:TestSubject instance that is referenced by the earl:subject > property. Here is a better example that shows both methods: > > <earl:subject> > <earl:TestSubject> > <dc:title xml:lang="en">left nav bar</dc:title> > <dc:description rdf:parseType="Literal"><![CDATA[<xhtml xml:lang="fr" > ...>...</xhtml>]]></dc:description> > </earl:TestSubject> > </earl:subject> > > > Still, I do not see a use case for dc:language. Correct? > > Best, > Shadi > > > Johannes Koch wrote: >> >> Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: >>> What about using the xml:lang attribute on the RDF nodes (for example >>> <earl:subject xml:lang="fr" .../>)? >>> >>> Or even better, when possible, within the content itself. For example >>> <earl:subject><![CDATA[<xhtml xml:lang="fr" >>> ...>...</xhtml>]]></earl:subject>. >> >> The object for earl:subject is not defined to be a Literal. It must be >> an earl:TestSubject. >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9zO8+uAhaUHEvIoRAuGNAJ9H/7w/hU8bXoPpWwQ5LNCombKO7QCglP6U ZtRJB1M+mWT33FgeEVtTUgY= =44h+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 19:09:24 UTC