- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:15:42 +0200
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Right. I bow before you humbly. ;)
The correct way would be to do this in the dc:description of the earl:TestSubject instance that is referenced by the earl:subject property. Here is a better example that shows both methods:
<earl:subject>
<earl:TestSubject>
<dc:title xml:lang="en">left nav bar</dc:title>
<dc:description rdf:parseType="Literal"><![CDATA[<xhtml xml:lang="fr" ...>...</xhtml>]]></dc:description>
</earl:TestSubject>
</earl:subject>
Still, I do not see a use case for dc:language. Correct?
Best,
Shadi
Johannes Koch wrote:
>
> Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> What about using the xml:lang attribute on the RDF nodes (for example
>> <earl:subject xml:lang="fr" .../>)?
>>
>> Or even better, when possible, within the content itself. For example
>> <earl:subject><![CDATA[<xhtml xml:lang="fr"
>> ...>...</xhtml>]]></earl:subject>.
>
> The object for earl:subject is not defined to be a Literal. It must be
> an earl:TestSubject.
>
--
Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 17:15:50 UTC