- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 16:37:33 +0200
- To: "Vicente Luque Centeno" <vlc@it.uc3m.es>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Bcc to ERT group for information. Hi Vicente, this is interesting work. I think that you have misinterpreted some of the WCAG - for example "No abbreviation or acronym should be defined more than once" is not what the relevant checkpoint means. Unfortunately (from my perspective) the WCAG group has not been very open to helping clarify how the WCAG should be interpreted. I hope that this will change somewhat, as work like yours starts to make it important. You should consider announcing it to the Evaluation and Repair Tools working group. Best regards Chaals On Sat, 28 May 2005 15:54:50 +0200, Vicente Luque Centeno <vlc@it.uc3m.es> wrote: > In order to have better WCAG rules for automated tools, I recently > published [1]. They are just a set of XPath/XQuery based expressions that > rewrite WCAG in a more automatable and less fuzzy way... -- Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk Here's one we prepared earlier: http://www.opera.com/download
Received on Saturday, 28 May 2005 14:37:46 UTC