- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:49:04 +0200
- To: Nils Ulltveit-Moe <nils@u-moe.no>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, Nils Ulltveit-Moe wrote: > These are difficult questions, and neither strategy is completely right > or wrong. > > What are your views on how data can be aggregated? Indeed, it is a tricky issue. Should we implement some form of earl:confidence property then we must ensure we have a mechanism to aggregate it. For example, by defining reasonable data types. However, I don't think that the aggregation "policy" should be part of EARL. Not even part of WCAG. It may make a lot of sense to release a Working Group Note or similar document on a possible strategy for using the earl:confidence property in the context of WCAG (if we should implement it), but EARL should be not limited to that one use case. Do you share the same view? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra, Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org/ Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES) http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 14:49:03 UTC