- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:08:45 -0500
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
- Message-Id: <c5b103e453a8cc35f4570384ea1dcf70@w3.org>
Le 08 mars 2005, à 17:46, Charles McCathieNevile a écrit : > The current draft EARL spec uses a number of things, including entity > declarations, to try and make the syntax slightly more readable. Since > RDF is a) meant for machines, not people, an b) about as readable in > any form it apears in, the version I drafted that actually validates > doesn't use the entity stuff. It means the document is longer, but it > relies on fewer things being implemented in order to achieve > interoperability. Yep as long as it doesn't change the graph, abbreviated or not is something which should be handled at a software level. I think it's the work of the implementer to deal with it. It can be suggested that one type of ouput is preferred, but even that, I'm not sure it's necessary. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 04:46:05 UTC