Re: for discussion: request for additional properties

Hi Nick,

> Since those are dc:, they can presumably be used regardless of whether
> the earl spec mentions them specifically?

Yes, they can be used regardless. However, just like in other classes, I
think we reference all core properties in the schema for the sake of
completeness and for those who are using EARL as XML (rather than RDF).


>> earl:WebContent
>>  * earl:Hash
>
> maybe earl:checksum?
>
> Whatever we use needs to document exactly what has been hashed.
> Document contents?  Contents + response headers?  Contents + negotiation?
> Normalised contents?
>
> FWIW I need to hold several such measures.

Let's discuss on the call tomorrow, maybe we will need to take this up at
the F2F if it is a major discussion (which it seems to be).


> I started reading the spec. over the weekend, and it led me to contemplate
> quite a few things I've overlooked whilst hacking through the fine detail.
> I need to find time to collect thoughts and post them.

Great! Please send as soon as possible, especially any potential "show
stoppers".

Regards,
  Shadi

Received on Monday, 29 August 2005 16:43:57 UTC