- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:10:50 +0100
- To: shadi@w3.org
On Monday 29 August 2005 10:08, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Hi, > > It occurred to me that the following properties could be useful to > incorporate into the EARL schema (all optional): > > earl:TestCase > * dc:title > * dc:description > * dc:location > > earl:Software > * dc:description > * dc:location Since those are dc:, they can presumably be used regardless of whether the earl spec mentions them specifically? > earl:WebContent > * earl:Hash maybe earl:checksum? Whatever we use needs to document exactly what has been hashed. Document contents? Contents + response headers? Contents + negotiation? Normalised contents? FWIW I need to hold several such measures. I started reading the spec. over the weekend, and it led me to contemplate quite a few things I've overlooked whilst hacking through the fine detail. I need to find time to collect thoughts and post them. -- Nick Kew
Received on Monday, 29 August 2005 14:41:35 UTC