Re: WCAG 1.0 Checklist expressed with EARL TestCase

Updated.


Johannes Koch wrote:
> 
> Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
> 
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <rdf:RDF xmlns:earl="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#"
>>          xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>>          xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/#">
> 
> [..]
> 
>> <earl:TestCase rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#wc-priority-1">
>>   <dc:title>Priority 1 Checkpoints</dc:title>
>>   <dc:description rdf:parseType="Literal">A Web content developer 
>> <strong>must</strong> satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more 
>> groups will find it impossible to access information in the document. 
>> Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic requirement for some groups to 
>> be able to use Web documents.</dc:description>
> 
> [...]
> 
> Shouldn't there be a namespace declaration for unprefixed (XHTML?) 
> elements?

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra,     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
Chair and Team Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),           http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
WAI-TIES Project,                 http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,     http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles -- 06560, Sophia-Antipolis -- France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64           Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22