Re: WCAG 1.0 Checklist expressed with EARL TestCase

Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:

> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <rdf:RDF xmlns:earl="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#"
>          xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>          xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/#">
[..]
> <earl:TestCase rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#wc-priority-1">
>   <dc:title>Priority 1 Checkpoints</dc:title>
>   <dc:description rdf:parseType="Literal">A Web content developer <strong>must</strong> satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups will find it impossible to access information in the document. Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic requirement for some groups to be able to use Web documents.</dc:description>
[...]

Shouldn't there be a namespace declaration for unprefixed (XHTML?) elements?
-- 
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628

Received on Monday, 22 August 2005 10:32:00 UTC