- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:51:27 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Hi, > > Based on Christophe's findings in PDF and Flash, I suggest adding the > following properties to earl:location (which is still in discussion > itself): > > * earl:page - to help describe the location in word processor formats > > * earl:frame - to help describe the location in frame-based formats (eg. > multimedia presentations) > > * earl:time - to help describe the location in a time-based format (eg. > audio files) > > What do people think of that? [ replying in a hurry; have to catch a bus ] What's the current status of earl:location? It seems to me that if we're introducing these properties, we need to distinguish between freestanding properties and offsets (like time), as well as between points and ranges. -- Nick Kew
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2005 16:51:15 UTC