Re: EARL and Website Production Management Techniques

Cross-posted to public-annotea-dev - annotea followup better there I think  
(EARL use case stuff should go back to the public-wai-ert list)

I think it would be useful to read the threads Mark Smith motivated on the  
public-annotea-dev list, because he is thinking on very similar lines...

have a look at  
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotea-dev/2005JanMar/thread.html  
where there are a few threads, totalling about 15 messages, essentially  
discussing the mechanics of using annotea to store bugzilla-type  
information...

cheers

Chaals

(lots of context included below for annotea folks).

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:51:51 +0200, Nils Ulltveit-Moe <nils@u-moe.no>  
wrote:

> Hi Charles,
>
> s�n, 17,.04.2005 kl. 11.59 +0200, skrev Charles McCathieNevile:
> AccMonitor is a tool for managing large websites, that can check them  
> over
>> every day and report on a whole lot of stuff. I think it can also direct
>> some manual testing to be done - for example guided by where there are
>> common problems that arise of one kind.
>>
>> I think this is an important use case to develop.
>>
>> A further related example would be doing specGL reviews over time on a
>> specification, (such as EARL :-) to ensure that we are improving in the
>> way we are meeting the various QA requirements that a W3C spec should
>> before it gets to Recommendation.
>
> This is interesting! I have thought of some way of doing this, by
> marrying AnnoZilla, PyNotea (my Python based Annotea server) and
> BugZilla, to create a tool for performing document and code inspections
> by annotating issues in the document. AnnoZilla is almost there now, the
> only thing that would be needed is some other categories of annotations
> that were more in line with code and document inspections.
>
> In this way it would be easier to track if and how an issue had been
> dealt with. You could also use this for requirements tracking, if all
> requirements were stored in the bug/feature database.
>
> I have been thinking if and how EARL would fit into this scheme? I am
> not convinced that it fits in yet.



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile                      Fundacion Sidar
charles@sidar.org   +61 409 134 136    http://www.sidar.org

Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 00:00:04 UTC