- From: Nils Ulltveit-Moe <nils@u-moe.no>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 22:08:32 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org, wp3_eiao@osys.grm.hia.no, wp5_eiao@osys.grm.hia.no
Hi again, I promised myself to close the discussion on the conficence value last week. However during the workshop we have arranged at Agder University College last week on metamodel based accessibility testing, the issue about the confidence value came up again. The conclusion so far, is also that we do indeed need to be able to represent the confidence value of the test result. (I indicated last week that being able to use earl:cannotTell might be sufficient, since it will indicate low confidence in the value.) However for automatic assessments knowing the exact confidence value for e.g. expert systems or learning systems is very important, so we will be using it internally. If it is defined as an optional feature in EARL, then others may also be able to use this value from our tools, and we would hope that other tool vendors also eventually supported it in the cases where a confidence value makes sense. Mvh. -- Nils Ulltveit-Moe <nils@u-moe.no>
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2005 20:04:22 UTC