- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:41:26 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Hi All, At 20:59 15/07/2008, Tim Boland wrote: >I have revised my reviews of 001 and 002 after considering the new >information in: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jul/0014.html >and rereading the process document. All my conclusions now are >"pass" or "fail" (no more "not sures).. with additional explanations provided. I forgot to say that people who abstained in the straw poll can update their response. I have also fixed the incorrect link to the TSD TF mailing list archives in dc:creator that Tim mentioned in his reviews: it said "http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tests/" instead of "http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/". Best regards, Christophe >Thanks and best wishes >Tim Boland NIST > -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ --- Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other "social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't. Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:42:19 UTC