RE: Test Samples for TSD TF decision [batch #1 for 15 July 2008]

Thanks for the clarification - in that case, "abstain" for all except for 
numbers 030, 036, and 037, which are "accept as-is"

Best, Tim Boland, NIST

At 05:57 PM 7/14/2008 +0200, you wrote:

>Hi Tim,
>
>At 16:49 14/07/2008, Tim Boland wrote:
>
>>I'm not sure what it precisely means to "accept" the test sample - does 
>>that mean that we
>>agree with the review results or trust the reviewer?  In 
>>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/process, Step 4 Description prose has 
>>"decision" used in two different contexts?  What is the exact "decision" 
>>that we're making in this
>>voting?
>
>The voting itself is not a task force decision but provides input to the 
>discussion (during the teleconference) that leads to the task force 
>decision, much like the straw polls in the WCAG working group are input 
>for dicussion in the teleconferences.
>Does this help?
>
>Best regards,
>
>Christophe
>
>
>>Thanks and best wishes
>>Tim Boland NIST
>>
>>   At 04:13 PM 7/14/2008 +0200, you wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Shadi and everybody else,
>>>
>>>
>>> > Below is a batch of Test Samples that have been reviewed and are ready
>>> > for a TSD TF decision. For each Test Sample you should indicate one of
>>> > the following:
>>> >
>>> > 1. "Accept as-is" - to accept the review results as they are
>>> > 2. "Accept with changes" - to accept the review with changes
>>> > 3. "Abstain" - to abstain from a vote (for whatever reason)
>>> > 4. "Propose changes" - suggest changes to the review results
>>> >
>>> > Please provide a rationale where appropriate (especially for #2 and #4).
>>> >
>>> > Note: you do not need to go through the full review but just verify that
>>> > you agree with the review results, especially with any recommendations
>>> > or comments that the reviewers make.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > BATCH #1:
>>> > 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content 
>>> -> structure-separation-programmatic_001>
>>> > 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content 
>>> -> structure-separation-programmatic_002>
>>>
>>>Not sure, they are plenty of "not sure" and open questions. Hard to know 
>>>what are you supposed to agree with.
>>>
>>> > 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content 
>>> -> structure-separation-programmatic_016>
>>> > 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content 
>>> -> structure-separation-programmatic_018>
>>> > 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content 
>>> -> structure-separation-programmatic_019>
>>> > 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content 
>>> -> structure-separation-programmatic_026>
>>>
>>>Of course I agree with myself so I suppose that "Accept as-is", but 
>>>probably it should be an Abstain, no?
>>>
>>>Now seriously, should I vote on my own reviews?
>>>
>>>(note that there are also several "can not tell" assertions in my 
>>>reviews, so it may also be hard for others to express an opinion on them)
>>>
>>> > 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content 
>>> -> structure-separation-programmatic_030>
>>>
>>>Accept as-is
>>>
>>> > 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content 
>>> -> structure-separation-programmatic_036>
>>>
>>>Accept as-is
>>>
>>> > 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content 
>>> -> structure-separation-programmatic_037>
>>>
>>>Accept as-is
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>  CI.
>>>
>>>____________________
>>>
>>>Carlos Iglesias
>>>
>>>Fundación CTIC
>>>Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón
>>>33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España
>>>teléfono: +34 984291212
>>>email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
>>>URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
>
>--
>Christophe Strobbe
>K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
>Research Group on Document Architectures
>Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
>B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
>BELGIUM
>tel: +32 16 32 85 51
>http://www.docarch.be/
>---
>Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other "social 
>networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't.
>
>
>Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
>
>

Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 18:22:51 UTC