- From: Evangelos Vlachogiannis <evlach@aegean.gr>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:36:29 +0200
- To: TSDTF <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>
late regrets...
Christophe Strobbe wrote:
>
> Dear TSD TF participants,
>
>
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday 19 February 2008
> from 13:30 to 14:30 UTC:
> * 05:30 to 06:30 North American Pacific Time (PST)
> * 08:30 to 09:30 North American Eastern Time (EST)
> * 14:30 to 15:30 Central European Summer Time (CEST)
> * 23:30 to 00:30 (Wednesday) Australian Eastern Time
>
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner(s) to find out the precise
> date for your own time zone:
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
>
>
> Next on the scribe rotation list is: Tim
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/scribes#scribes-tsd>
>
>
> The teleconference information is:
> * +1-617-761-6200 (US), +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France),
> +44.117.370.6152 (UK)
> * Passcode 8783 ("TSTF")
> * IRC server irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #tsdtf
>
>
> AGENDA:
>
> 1. Next steps for current repository content: update first?
> We currently have almost 200 test samples that were created for
> older WCAG 2.0 working drafts (April 2006 or May 2007). Should we
> update them before we continue reviewing them?
> See <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList> and
> <http://tinyurl.com/ynu7q4>.
>
> 2. Review of test samples
> See the issues that came out of Tim's reviews:
>
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jan/0009.html>
>
> And Carlos Iglesias' comments at
>
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Feb/0003.html>
>
>
> 3. Naming convention and test suite ID in metadata
> See
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Dec/0000.html>
>
> - pending action
> <http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04>:
> CS send summary of the ID/naming/referencing mechanism of the tests,
> and collect the open issues (or previously discussed issues that
> were
> not ideally resolved)
>
> 4. API test tool technique & WCAG test procedures
> An issue raised by Cynthia Shelly (in CC of this mail) during the
> last WCAG telecon: some new techniques contain a test procedure that
> relies on tools for inspecting accessibility interfaces.
> [Question from Carlos Iglesias: Are these techniques only testable
> using the referenced tools?]
>
> 5. Review of action items
> The first one needs to be reassigned; some of the others may be
> getting stale:
> * test cases without a technique/failure mapping:
> - action item:
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01>
> * test samples ready for review: see reviewers 03 through 10 at
> - action items:
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03>
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04>
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action05>
> (discussed 04 Dec 2007)
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action07>
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action06>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Carlos Velasco and Christophe Strobbe
>
>
>
> ---
> Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other "social
> networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't.
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 13:36:37 UTC