- From: Evangelos Vlachogiannis <evlach@aegean.gr>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:36:29 +0200
- To: TSDTF <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>
late regrets... Christophe Strobbe wrote: > > Dear TSD TF participants, > > > The next teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday 19 February 2008 > from 13:30 to 14:30 UTC: > * 05:30 to 06:30 North American Pacific Time (PST) > * 08:30 to 09:30 North American Eastern Time (EST) > * 14:30 to 15:30 Central European Summer Time (CEST) > * 23:30 to 00:30 (Wednesday) Australian Eastern Time > > Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner(s) to find out the precise > date for your own time zone: > <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html> > > > Next on the scribe rotation list is: Tim > <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/scribes#scribes-tsd> > > > The teleconference information is: > * +1-617-761-6200 (US), +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France), > +44.117.370.6152 (UK) > * Passcode 8783 ("TSTF") > * IRC server irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #tsdtf > > > AGENDA: > > 1. Next steps for current repository content: update first? > We currently have almost 200 test samples that were created for > older WCAG 2.0 working drafts (April 2006 or May 2007). Should we > update them before we continue reviewing them? > See <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList> and > <http://tinyurl.com/ynu7q4>. > > 2. Review of test samples > See the issues that came out of Tim's reviews: > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jan/0009.html> > > And Carlos Iglesias' comments at > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Feb/0003.html> > > > 3. Naming convention and test suite ID in metadata > See > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Dec/0000.html> > > - pending action > <http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04>: > CS send summary of the ID/naming/referencing mechanism of the tests, > and collect the open issues (or previously discussed issues that > were > not ideally resolved) > > 4. API test tool technique & WCAG test procedures > An issue raised by Cynthia Shelly (in CC of this mail) during the > last WCAG telecon: some new techniques contain a test procedure that > relies on tools for inspecting accessibility interfaces. > [Question from Carlos Iglesias: Are these techniques only testable > using the referenced tools?] > > 5. Review of action items > The first one needs to be reassigned; some of the others may be > getting stale: > * test cases without a technique/failure mapping: > - action item: > <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01> > * test samples ready for review: see reviewers 03 through 10 at > - action items: > <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03> > <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04> > <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action05> > (discussed 04 Dec 2007) > <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action07> > <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action06> > > > Best regards, > > Carlos Velasco and Christophe Strobbe > > > > --- > Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other "social > networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't.
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 13:36:37 UTC