- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:50:33 +0100
- To: TSDTF <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>
- Cc: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>
Dear TSD TF participants, The next teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday 19 February 2008 from 13:30 to 14:30 UTC: * 05:30 to 06:30 North American Pacific Time (PST) * 08:30 to 09:30 North American Eastern Time (EST) * 14:30 to 15:30 Central European Summer Time (CEST) * 23:30 to 00:30 (Wednesday) Australian Eastern Time Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner(s) to find out the precise date for your own time zone: <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html> Next on the scribe rotation list is: Tim <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/scribes#scribes-tsd> The teleconference information is: * +1-617-761-6200 (US), +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France), +44.117.370.6152 (UK) * Passcode 8783 ("TSTF") * IRC server irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #tsdtf AGENDA: 1. Next steps for current repository content: update first? We currently have almost 200 test samples that were created for older WCAG 2.0 working drafts (April 2006 or May 2007). Should we update them before we continue reviewing them? See <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList> and <http://tinyurl.com/ynu7q4>. 2. Review of test samples See the issues that came out of Tim's reviews: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jan/0009.html> And Carlos Iglesias' comments at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Feb/0003.html> 3. Naming convention and test suite ID in metadata See <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Dec/0000.html> - pending action <http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04>: CS send summary of the ID/naming/referencing mechanism of the tests, and collect the open issues (or previously discussed issues that were not ideally resolved) 4. API test tool technique & WCAG test procedures An issue raised by Cynthia Shelly (in CC of this mail) during the last WCAG telecon: some new techniques contain a test procedure that relies on tools for inspecting accessibility interfaces. [Question from Carlos Iglesias: Are these techniques only testable using the referenced tools?] 5. Review of action items The first one needs to be reassigned; some of the others may be getting stale: * test cases without a technique/failure mapping: - action item: <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01> * test samples ready for review: see reviewers 03 through 10 at - action items: <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action05> (discussed 04 Dec 2007) <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action07> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action06> Best regards, Carlos Velasco and Christophe Strobbe --- Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other "social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't. -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Monday, 18 February 2008 14:50:50 UTC