- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:44:34 -0500
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Forwarded message (in case I didn't send it earlier) >To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org >From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov> >Subject: Re: Wiki: proposals for templates and index page available >for review > >Thanks for all your good work. I have the following initial comments: > >If a test sample can undergo several structure reviews, does this mean >that one person will do multiple reviews at different times (maybe implied >since there is a "Reviewer" assigned), or different people will do >different reviews? If the latter, how do we know who does which review? > >For structure review, should there be a column for additional >comments? Also should there be definitions of "committed", >"available", "valid", etc. for a reviewer to consult? Should there be a >link to "the naming conventions", "the correct format", and "the correct >syntax" for the reviewer to consult? Why is the "unintentional" in there >for "broken links"? What exactly are "other values" and "other texts" >(maybe some examples)? What does it mean for locations to be "referenced >correctly" and to be "consistent with each other"? > >If defects are found in the structure review, how are those corrected? Is >the submitter notified? > >That's it so far.. will move on to "content review".. > >Thanks and best wishes >Tim Boland NIST > >At 03:55 PM 2/6/2007 +0100, you wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Vangelis and I had action items to create proposals for the review >>information (and other metadata not stored in TCDL) and an index page. >>There are two approaches available for review: >>* Vangelis created one template for the structure review [1], and one for >>the content review [2]; >>* I have also created a template for a page that would combine info from >>structure and content reviews with info on the contributor or source of >>the test sample, task force straw poll comments (if we decide to work >>with straw polls) and WCAG WG decisions/comments [3]. There would be one >>such page per test sample (the ID of the test sample would match the >>title of the page), which would enable us to see at a glance what has >>been done for a specific test sample. >> >>I have also created a proposal for an index page [4]. This currently >>contains an empty table with columns for test sample ID (with link to web >>version of the TCDL metadata), a link to the test sample's wiki page (see >>above), the name of the reviewer to whom the test sample is assigned, and >>it's status. (It would be even nicer if such a table could be generated >>automatically from our other data ...) >> >>Links to these proposals can be found on the front page of our Wiki at >>http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/FrontPage. >> >>Please send comments to the list by next Monday. >> >>Best regards, >> >>Christophe >> >>[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStructureReviewTemplate >>[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleContentReviewTemplate >>[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleOverviewTemplate >>[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList >> >> >>-- >>Christophe Strobbe >>K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on >>Document Architectures >>Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM >>tel: +32 16 32 85 51 >>http://www.docarch.be/ >> >>Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 14:45:14 UTC