Re: Reviewing SpecName

Hi Christophe,

Christophe Strobbe wrote:
> At 20:08 3/04/2007, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> After re-reading the checklist for content review, I wonder if we 
>> should say something about the usage of SpecName in the metadata. The 
>> SpecName technologies in there should really match the intention (or 
>> references) of the respective WCAG 2.0 Technique.
>> Any objections? Any wording suggestions?
> I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at.
> Is this related to the applicability section in the WCAG 2.0 techniques 
> and failures? I.e. do you mean that the content review should check that 
> technologies in the test sample (or at least the technology in which the 
> technique or failure can be highlighted) is also in the applicability 
> section? (Or rather the other way around?)

For example, the test sample "sc1.3.1_l1_018" applies to (X)HTML. What 
happens if the SpecName attribute (wrongly) refers to CSS instead? This 
must be checked...


Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)  |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), |
WAI-TIES Project,       |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |

Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 19:19:36 UTC