- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:04:08 +0200
- To: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Cc: cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>, public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Good points Tim, I will address them in my update of the usage document. Thanks, Shadi Tim Boland wrote: > > Good job on the document. I had a couple of questions: > > (1) Abstract - will there be a link to the actual WCAG2.0 techniques > where "WCAG2.0 Techniques" is referenced? Also, "content samples" is > mentioned - what is the difference between that term and "test sample"? > If "content sample" is a separate term, then maybe it should be defined > under "terms and definitions"? > > (2) Terms and Definitions - "usability" is mentioned in definitions for > "test case" and "test sample". Is usability testing intended to be done > in the context of this document? There may be some confusion since it > is stated earlier "this document describes the usage of.." What is a > "content format" and how is that different from "data format" in the > "technology" definition? > > (3) Would you want to reference QA Test Development FAQ [1] as a > resource in this document? > > Thanks and best wishes > Tim Boland NIST > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/01/test-faq > > > At 12:41 PM 10/21/2006 +0200, you wrote: >> Hi Shane, All, >> >> Quoting Shane Anderson <shane@cpd2.usu.edu>: >> > (...) >> > So far the usage document is not too helpful. What exactly is >> > the main goal of the usage document? >> > Is it a reference for TCDL language or a "how to" >> > document? >> >> The usage document is meant to be a short description of how the task >> force uses TCDL. The reference for the TCDL language itself is >> http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0.html and it seems preferable not to >> duplicate most of that information. >> The usage document still needs some work to make it more useful and >> more inviting for outsiders and newcomers, and I will continue working >> on it next week. >> >> One of the things we can do is to add a list or table similar to the >> one in Appendix B of EARL (http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-EARL10-Schema- >> 20060927/#terms-list). >> Any other ideas on how to make the document more useful would be >> welcome. I have attached a slightly updated version to this mail. >> >> >> > Under section "Terms and Definitions" the links to WCAG 2 and >> > W3C QA Voc. do not work. >> >> Ah, yes, the "References" section is empty. >> >> >> > I assume some of the more obvious errors are known (e.g. >> > level "1" on every section). >> >> The comment in parentheses is not clear. Are you referring to the fact >> that Firefox numbers each section as "1"? I intend to replace the CSS- >> generated numbers by manual numbering, but was waiting to do this until >> the document was stable. >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Christophe Strobbe >> >> -- >> Christophe Strobbe >> K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on >> Document Architectures >> Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM >> tel: +32 16 32 85 51 >> http://www.docarch.be/ >> >> >> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm >> > > > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Monday, 23 October 2006 22:04:25 UTC