- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:24:54 -0400
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
For some reason this didn't make it onto the list earlier.. >Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:26:23 -0400 >To: cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be> >From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov> >Subject: Re: TCDL usage document: what is its purpose? >Cc: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > >Good job on the document. I had a couple of questions: > >(1) Abstract - will there be a link to the actual WCAG2.0 techniques where >"WCAG2.0 Techniques" is referenced? Also, "content samples" is mentioned >- what is the difference between that term and "test sample"? If "content >sample" is a separate term, then maybe it should be defined under "terms >and definitions"? > >(2) Terms and Definitions - "usability" is mentioned in definitions for >"test case" and "test sample". Is usability testing intended to be done >in the context of this document? There may be some confusion since it is >stated earlier "this document describes the usage of.." What is a >"content format" and how is that different from "data format" in the >"technology" definition? > >(3) Would you want to reference QA Test Development FAQ [1] as a resource >in this document? > >Thanks and best wishes >Tim Boland NIST > >[1]: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/01/test-faq > > >At 12:41 PM 10/21/2006 +0200, you wrote: >>Hi Shane, All, >> >>Quoting Shane Anderson <shane@cpd2.usu.edu>: >> > (...) >> > So far the usage document is not too helpful. What exactly is >> > the main goal of the usage document? >> > Is it a reference for TCDL language or a "how to" >> > document? >> >>The usage document is meant to be a short description of how the task >>force uses TCDL. The reference for the TCDL language itself is >>http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0.html and it seems preferable not to >>duplicate most of that information. >>The usage document still needs some work to make it more useful and >>more inviting for outsiders and newcomers, and I will continue working >>on it next week. >> >>One of the things we can do is to add a list or table similar to the >>one in Appendix B of EARL (http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-EARL10-Schema- >>20060927/#terms-list). >>Any other ideas on how to make the document more useful would be >>welcome. I have attached a slightly updated version to this mail. >> >> >> > Under section "Terms and Definitions" the links to WCAG 2 and >> > W3C QA Voc. do not work. >> >>Ah, yes, the "References" section is empty. >> >> >> > I assume some of the more obvious errors are known (e.g. >> > level "1" on every section). >> >>The comment in parentheses is not clear. Are you referring to the fact >>that Firefox numbers each section as "1"? I intend to replace the CSS- >>generated numbers by manual numbering, but was waiting to do this until >>the document was stable. >> >> >>Best regards, >> >>Christophe Strobbe >> >>-- >>Christophe Strobbe >>K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on >>Document Architectures >>Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM >>tel: +32 16 32 85 51 >>http://www.docarch.be/ >> >> >>Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Monday, 23 October 2006 18:26:19 UTC