Re: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 3 October

regrets. Still sick. :-(

On 10/2/06, cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be> wrote:
>
>
> Dear TSD TF participants,
>
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday 3 October 2006
> from 12:30 to 13:30 UTC:
> * 05:30 to 06:30 North American Pacific Time (PST)
> * 08:30 to 09:30 North American Eastern Time (EST)
> * 14:30 to 15:30 Central European Time (CET)
> * 00:30 to 01:30 (Wednesday) Australian Eastern Time
>
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise
> date for your own time zone:
>   <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
>
> Next on the scribe rotation list is: Michael
>   <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/scribes#scribes-tsd>
>
> The teleconference information is:
> * +1-617-761-6200
> * Passcode 8783 ("TSTF")
> * IRC server irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #tsdtf
>
>
> AGENDA:
> 1. Continue discussion on TCDL (version F) per section [1]
> 2. Start of test production phase
>
>
> The following changes were made since the previous draft of TCDL:
> * 'date' was changed to 'dc:date' [2],
> * 'description' was changed to 'dc:description' [2],
> * the TCDL example in Appendix B was updated,
> * 'dc:contributor' was moved between 'dc:creator' and 'dc:date' to
> avoid ambiguity in the content model of 'formalMetadata',
> * another example of 'rules' was added (with a 'technique' element),
> * 'location' can now have any attributes and elements in the EARL
> namespace.
>
>
> Some cleanup is still necessary. Other things that still need to be
> done:
> * The document on "Metadata Used by the Task Force" still needs to be
> created.
> * "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF" is mentioned in the secion on 'httpRequest'
> but the schema has not changed here.
> * There is no mechanism yet to refer to EARL reports.
>
>
> [1] http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/
> XML Schema: http://bentoweb.org/refs/schemas/tcdl2.0.xsd
>
> [2] This change has certain implications because of the data types: in
> instance documents, it will be necessary to reference the data type:
> <dc:date xsi:type="btw:btwDate">2009-09-29</dc:date> (see the example
> in Appendix B). Without xsi:type, there appeared to be no way to ensure
> validation.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Carlos Velasco and Christophe Strobbe
>
>
> --
> Christophe Strobbe
> K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on
> Document Architectures
> Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
> tel: +32 16 32 85 51
> http://www.docarch.be/
>
> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
>
>
>