Re: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 3 October

Regrets for me.  I will be in a conflicting meeting..

Tim Boland NIST

At 02:51 PM 10/2/2006 +0200, you wrote:

>Dear TSD TF participants,
>
>The next teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday 3 October 2006
>from 12:30 to 13:30 UTC:
>  * 05:30 to 06:30 North American Pacific Time (PST)
>  * 08:30 to 09:30 North American Eastern Time (EST)
>  * 14:30 to 15:30 Central European Time (CET)
>  * 00:30 to 01:30 (Wednesday) Australian Eastern Time
>
>Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise
>date for your own time zone:
>   <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
>
>Next on the scribe rotation list is: Michael
>   <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/scribes#scribes-tsd>
>
>The teleconference information is:
>  * +1-617-761-6200
>  * Passcode 8783 ("TSTF")
>  * IRC server irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #tsdtf
>
>
>AGENDA:
>1. Continue discussion on TCDL (version F) per section [1]
>2. Start of test production phase
>
>
>The following changes were made since the previous draft of TCDL:
>* 'date' was changed to 'dc:date' [2],
>* 'description' was changed to 'dc:description' [2],
>* the TCDL example in Appendix B was updated,
>* 'dc:contributor' was moved between 'dc:creator' and 'dc:date' to
>avoid ambiguity in the content model of 'formalMetadata',
>* another example of 'rules' was added (with a 'technique' element),
>* 'location' can now have any attributes and elements in the EARL
>namespace.
>
>
>Some cleanup is still necessary. Other things that still need to be
>done:
>* The document on "Metadata Used by the Task Force" still needs to be
>created.
>* "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF" is mentioned in the secion on 'httpRequest'
>but the schema has not changed here.
>* There is no mechanism yet to refer to EARL reports.
>
>
>[1] http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/
>XML Schema: http://bentoweb.org/refs/schemas/tcdl2.0.xsd
>
>[2] This change has certain implications because of the data types: in
>instance documents, it will be necessary to reference the data type:
><dc:date xsi:type="btw:btwDate">2009-09-29</dc:date> (see the example
>in Appendix B). Without xsi:type, there appeared to be no way to ensure
>validation.
>
>
>Best regards,
>Carlos Velasco and Christophe Strobbe
>
>
>--
>Christophe Strobbe
>K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on
>Document Architectures
>Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
>tel: +32 16 32 85 51
>http://www.docarch.be/
>
>Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 19:04:05 UTC