- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:45:12 +0100
- To: cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Cc: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Hi, cstrobbe wrote: > Referencing more than one test file from TCDL is not a problem (<file> > is repeatable). Yes, but something like "sc1.1.1_l1_001.html" is not repeatable. Are there cases in which more than one content file (of the same technology, I don't mean auxiliary resources) is required? > The reuse-versus-duplication issue raised by Vangelis is something > else. In this original mail [1] he proposed to use a naming convention > based on IDs of techniques instead of SC numbers. That could work, but > it would work better if we used the "Techniques for WCAG 2.0" as > "rules" instead of the success criteria - something that Shadi > suggested earlier. Can you confirm that the reuse-versus-duplication issue wouldn't also come up with the techniques approach? > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Sep/ > 0043.html Cheers, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 18:45:27 UTC