- From: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 23:18:53 +0200
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: "Green, James" <jgreen@visa.com>, Charlotte Wise <cwise@visa.com>, "Frausto, Alicia" <afrausto@visa.com>, WSTF <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
I did not get any suggestions for icons. When I implemented it, I asked for feedback. I’ll change the icons ASAP. Sent from my iPhone > On 28. Sep 2017, at 18:46, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote: > > Hiya, > > Summary: OK to leave icons as is, except one*? > > More info: > > In the prototype <http://w3c.github.io/wai-website/>, the middle boxes currently have the icons from Alicia's initial design, over different content. I don't want to nitpick at this point, and would say leave them*; however, I wonder if it will be distracting for the usability testing -- because the icons don't make sense with the content? > > If y'all don't think it will be much of a problem, I'm fine just leaving those icons*. Or, if Alicia wants to do new ones, I'm fine with that, too. If we think we might want icons there, then I do think we should have some, and *not* just take them off for the testing next week. > > * The one change I think is *important* is to change the gavel above WCAG 2.1! > For a quick-n-easy fix, could put the check icon (that was at the top previously with Easy Checks) above How to Meet WCAG 2.0, and just move the code icon above WCAG 2.1. > > Thanks, > ~Shawn >
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2017 21:19:12 UTC