- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:57:52 -0500
- To: public-wai-eo-site@w3.org
On 9/7/2017 12:52 PM, Bakken, Brent wrote: > > On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:55, Shawn Henry wrote: > > > On 9/6/2017 9:46 AM, Eric Eggert wrote: > > Hi Shawn, > > On 6 Sep 2017, at 16:35, Shawn Henry wrote: > > Additional question for Charlotte: What level of info for the UT? e.g., on specific resources? or only on nav, general design, type stuff? > > On 9/5/2017 3:07 PM, Shawn Henry wrote: > > Hi Charlotte and all, > > We have a few questions and issues related to draft material for usability testing (UT). We plan to have the navigation and resource titles done, but most of the revised content probably will not be finalized and approved by EOWG before UT. I'm assuming that the site for usability testing will not be public, and so we don't need to be as concerned with unapproved material being included. I wanted to confirm that, and also make sure we cover related issues. > > Is it correct that the only people who will see the content used in UT are the test participants and the people who prepare and participate in the test (e.g., observers)? > > We will want to mark unapproved content as draft, yet in a way that won't interfere with UT. If it was to be public, we would have big notice at the top. I think we don't want that. I think clear indication in the document footer area is enough. Let us know if you have any thoughts on this. > > > Brent helped me realize the site for UT will probably have to be public for UT. Right now I'm thinking that before and after the UT we'll have big banner at top saying draft - and move that to the bottom during UT. Can we check in on that briefly in today's meeting? > > > I will make sure that there will be a way to display the website without a banner for the UT. > > > In yesterday's meeting, Charlotte suggested password protect. > > My guess is that's hard to do. > > Happy to leave it up to you, Eric. > > > I can upload a version to w3.org <http://w3.org/> and hide it behind a W3C login so you can only see it with a W3C account. The other idea is to provide the page in a private GitHub repository and remove the banners from there so you’d need to know the URL to find it (of course locking out search engines). > > > Eric, I don't think the testers will have W3C accounts. They don't need to. Anyone with an account can sign in, e.g., Charlotte, me, James, Sharron, etc. :-) ~Shawn > > *__* > > Brent A. Bakken > Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services > Pearson > > 512 202 1087 > brent.bakken@pearson.com <mailto:brent.bakken@pearson.com> > > Learn more at pearson.com <http://pearson.com> > Pearson > > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org <mailto:ee@w3.org>> wrote: > > > > On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:55, Shawn Henry wrote: > > On 9/6/2017 9:46 AM, Eric Eggert wrote: > > Hi Shawn, > > On 6 Sep 2017, at 16:35, Shawn Henry wrote: > > Additional question for Charlotte: What level of info for the UT? e.g., on specific resources? or only on nav, general design, type stuff? > > On 9/5/2017 3:07 PM, Shawn Henry wrote: > > Hi Charlotte and all, > > We have a few questions and issues related to draft material for usability testing (UT). We plan to have the navigation and resource titles done, but most of the revised content probably will not be finalized and approved by EOWG before UT. I'm assuming that the site for usability testing will not be public, and so we don't need to be as concerned with unapproved material being included. I wanted to confirm that, and also make sure we cover related issues. > > Is it correct that the only people who will see the content used in UT are the test participants and the people who prepare and participate in the test (e.g., observers)? > > We will want to mark unapproved content as draft, yet in a way that won't interfere with UT. If it was to be public, we would have big notice at the top. I think we don't want that. I think clear indication in the document footer area is enough. Let us know if you have any thoughts on this. > > > Brent helped me realize the site for UT will probably have to be public for UT. Right now I'm thinking that before and after the UT we'll have big banner at top saying draft - and move that to the bottom during UT. Can we check in on that briefly in today's meeting? > > > I will make sure that there will be a way to display the website without a banner for the UT. > > > In yesterday's meeting, Charlotte suggested password protect. > > My guess is that's hard to do. > > Happy to leave it up to you, Eric. > > > I can upload a version to w3.org <http://w3.org> and hide it behind a W3C login so you can only see it with a W3C account. The other idea is to provide the page in a private GitHub repository and remove the banners from there so you’d need to know the URL to find it (of course locking out search engines). > > Both is equally complicated but not a huge burden. > > Eric > > > ~Shawn > > > > Eric > > > Thanks, > ~Shawn > > > > > What about dates for content changes? We see: > * Final prototype or interface due: 18 September > * Test-the-test: 28 September > > We hope to have the navigation and resource titles set for UT by 18 Sept. > > Is it OK to make content changes after 18 Sept as long as we tell you beforehand that they are planned, and then when we make the changes? Is it correct that we shouldn't make any changes after, say, 26 Sept? > > Thanks! > ~Shawn > > > > > > > > -- > > Eric Eggert > Web Accessibility Specialist > Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > > > > > -- > > Eric Eggert > Web Accessibility Specialist > Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 17:58:03 UTC