Re: agenda+ Re: Draft material for usability testing

Hi Shawn,

On 6 Sep 2017, at 16:35, Shawn Henry wrote:

> Additional question for Charlotte: What level of info for the UT? 
> e.g., on specific resources? or only on nav, general design, type 
> stuff?
>
> On 9/5/2017 3:07 PM, Shawn Henry wrote:
>> Hi Charlotte and all,
>>
>> We have a few questions and issues related to draft material for 
>> usability testing (UT). We plan to have the navigation and resource 
>> titles done, but most of the revised content probably will not be 
>> finalized and approved by EOWG before UT. I'm assuming that the site 
>> for usability testing will not be public, and so we don't need to be 
>> as concerned with unapproved material being included. I wanted to 
>> confirm that, and also make sure we cover related issues.
>>
>> Is it correct that the only people who will see the content used in 
>> UT are the test participants and the people who prepare and 
>> participate in the test (e.g., observers)?
>>
>> We will want to mark unapproved content as draft, yet in a way that 
>> won't interfere with UT. If it was to be public, we would have big 
>> notice at the top. I think we don't want that. I think clear 
>> indication in the document footer area is enough. Let us know if you 
>> have any thoughts on this.
>
> Brent helped me realize the site for UT will probably have to be 
> public for UT. Right now I'm thinking that before and after the UT 
> we'll have big banner at top saying draft - and move that to the 
> bottom during UT. Can we check in on that briefly in today's meeting?

I will make sure that there will be a way to display the website without 
a banner for the UT.

Eric

>
> Thanks,
> ~Shawn
>
>
>
>>
>> What about dates for content changes? We see:
>>      * Final prototype or interface due: 18 September
>>      * Test-the-test: 28 September
>>
>> We hope to have the navigation and resource titles set for UT by 18 
>> Sept.
>>
>> Is it OK to make content changes after 18 Sept as long as we tell you 
>> beforehand that they are planned, and then when we make the changes? 
>> Is it correct that we shouldn't make any changes after, say, 26 Sept?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> ~Shawn
>>
>>
>>
>>



--

Eric Eggert
Web Accessibility Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2017 14:47:24 UTC