Re: more wireframe variations

Hi Michael,

Thank you for working on this! I personally prefer v1. We could also 
reuse the same icons (cross and tick) within the annotated pages to help 
associate the symbol with the content.

Best,
   Shadi


Michael Stenitzer wrote:
> 
> hi all,
> 
> i've prepared more wireframe variations, but i'm still not fully 
> satisfied with the results.
> 
> 
> http://www.wienfluss.net/BAD/20081123_BADv1.png
> http://www.wienfluss.net/BAD/20081123_BADv2.png
> http://www.wienfluss.net/BAD/20081123_BADv3.png
> http://www.wienfluss.net/BAD/20081123_BADv4.png
> 
> changes and notes:
> * moved top navigation to the top right page corner (was actually a
>   mistake)
> * increased whitespace in header
> * introduced icons for accessible and inaccessible versions. active tab
>   selections will have colored icons in green / red.
> * fixed typo in the tabs
> * in v1 and v2 the active tab is higher than the others.
> * in v3 and v4 the tabs are split (im not convinced if the metaphor is
>   clear in this case)
> * in v3 and v4 i have a bad(TM) feeling about the icon just in the first
>   tab of each pair, but think that it would be equally wrong with the
>   icon in each tab.
> * in v3 we have to extend the links to either of the annotated pages
>   with (hidden) information about the (in)accessibility of the
>   respective page.
> * v2 is easier to implement as the tabs are not right and left aligned
> 
> 
> any thoughts?
> 
> /michael
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |

Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 21:04:00 UTC