- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:59:14 +0100
- To: Thomas Jewett <jewett@csulb.edu>
- CC: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
Hi Tom, This is really useful, thank you! It is also a very interesting approach to reuse the existing format and adapt the "barriers" to WCAG 2.0. This will be very useful for the report and for the "in-between pages". Just to be clear, did you actually run any of these success criteria and techniques against the actual demo pages? What about the success criteria not listed here, does the demo meet them or are they not applicable? At some stage we need to end up with a full evaluation of the demo against WCAG 2.0 to identify the success criteria we meet and don't meet. Thanks, Shadi Thomas Jewett wrote: > > This time, I started with a stripped-down version of > the "barriers" page and identified the SC and techniques > used to correct each one in the "after" pages. Then I > added a list in SC/technique order at the top. Results at: > http://www.tomjewett.com/badtf/features-new.html > > I'd welcome corrections from those who know the code > a lot better than I do! > > Tom > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 20:59:52 UTC