Re: Accessibility evaluation for "after" template page

Hi Pasquale,

Thank you for doing this work! I should have been a little more clear, there wasn't a need for you to do such a formal report, I hope it wasn't too much work.

Anyway, your findings are interesting. Could you please clarify in more detail why checkpoint 1.1, 6.1, 12.3, 13.1, and 13.2 failed? Also, it would be helpful if you can provide information about the instances for each violation of these checkpoints and suggestions for repair.

Thanks,
  Shadi


Pasquale Popolizio wrote:
> Hi Shadi, hi all.
> Here are my findings about accessibility evaluation for "after" template 
> page.
> 
> The page is close to meeting WCAG 1.0 Level Double A.
> 
> Recommended priorities (taken from "Results of Review") for addressing 
> inaccessible features of site: content images not only in CSS 
> background, provide metadata to add semantic information, provide 
> information about the general layout of a site (for example, a site map 
> or table of contents), clearly identify the target of each link (in 
> "Elsewhere on the Web").
> 
> 
> Please, start from "evaluation.html" file.
> 
> regards
> ciao
> 
> ~ pasquale
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | 
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ | 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | 
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France | 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 15:25:31 UTC