- From: Howard Kramer <howard.kramer@colorado.edu>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 02:30:19 +0000
- To: Daniel Montalvo <dmontalvo@w3.org>, "public-wai-curricula@w3.org" <public-wai-curricula@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SJ0PR03MB6485255AAB81632EE931AB229C539@SJ0PR03MB6485.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Sorry - I will miss tomorrow's meeting. I have a conflicting appointment. -Howard ________________________________ From: Daniel Montalvo <dmontalvo@w3.org> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 12:33 PM To: public-wai-curricula@w3.org <public-wai-curricula@w3.org> Subject: [Agenda] WAI Curricula Task Force Teleconference, Tuesday May 11 Hello all, Tuesday May 11 we are going to have another WAI Curricula Task Force teleconference. Topic: WAI Curricula Task Force Weekly Meeting Time: Tuesday May 11 5:00 PM CET (Central Europe Time) Teleconference link and password: https://www.w3.org/2017/08/01-eowg-info.html IRC: https://irc.w3.org?channels=#wai-curricula Port 6665. Channel #wai-curricula Agenda: agenda+ FYIs on proposals to redefine scope for module "Inclusive Design Process" https://deploy-preview-347--wai-curricula.netlify.app/curricula/designer-modules/inclusive-design-process/ - Made it clearer that not every organization does user research - Focused responsibilities of user researchers to assess and communicate the need for involving people with disabilities depending on project scope. - Removed mentions to specific user research activities that may wrongly suggest that organizations that do not conduct these activities cannot involve people with disabilities agenda+ [New] Topic "Assessing Involvement of People with Disabilities". https://deploy-preview-347--wai-curricula.netlify.app/curricula/designer-modules/inclusive-design-process/#topic-assessing-the-involvement-of-people-with-disabilities - Describes potential benefits of involving people with disabilities and risks of not involving people with disabilities. - Addresses mainly user researchers. They should be aware that it is important to involve people with disabilities but they don't make the final decision as to how this involvement occurs (if it occurs at all). Do you think this topic clarifies the responsibilities of user researchers and differentiates them from those of other team members? agenda+ Redefined scope for last topic. https://deploy-preview-347--wai-curricula.netlify.app/curricula/designer-modules/inclusive-design-process/#topic-including-real-people-with-disabilities - Now "Including Real People with Disabilities", previously "Usability Testing". - Aspects discussed in this topic apply to a wider range of activities than user testing, so its scope has been broadened. Do you agree with this new approach? agenda+ Position of "Inclusive Design Process" with respect to the whole designer modules sequence Previously this module was the first in the sequence, now we are proposing to have it last, because; - WCAG does not get into specifics on how to involve people with disabilities. - Activities related to involving people with disabilities may not be conducted by all designers. Do you agree with putting "Inclusive Design Process" last in designer modules? -- Daniel Montalvo Accessibility Education and Training Specialist W3C/WAI -- Daniel Montalvo Accessibility Education and Training Specialist W3C/WAI
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2021 02:30:36 UTC