- From: Daniel Montalvo <dmontalvo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:14:25 +0100
- To: <public-wai-curricula@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <004b01d6edac$9d25b420$d7711c60$@w3.org>
Hello all, Tuesday January 19 we are going to have another WAI Curricula Task Force teleconference. Topic: WAI Curricula Task Force Weekly Meeting Time: January 19 2021 5:00 PM CET (Central Europe Time) Teleconference link and password: https://www.w3.org/2017/08/01-eowg-info.html IRC: http://irc.w3.org?channels=#wai-curricula Port 6665. Channel #wai-curricula Agenda: Agenda+ Communicating differences between "write markup" and "write code" We use "write markup" when referring to HTML and WAI-ARIA only, and "Write code" when referring to some additional coding techniques involving CSS and/or JavaScript. For some learning outcomes this difference is clear but for some others it may ambiguous and there are different opinions in the group. I took another pass to reduce this ambiguity. You can see last changes at https://github.com/w3c/wai-curricula/pull/308/commits/d2a4f50d689663cff204e00536d5dec4facdbe22 And whole pr diff at https://github.com/w3c/wai-curricula/pull/308/files Agenda+ Should we keep learning outcome "outline the benefits of using HTML native elements for compatibility with assistive technologies and adaptive strategies" In module 1, learning outcomes for module, we have: While it is an important aspect, some in the group think this is communicated throughout the rest of the curricula and there is no need for such an explicit learning outcome. -- Daniel Montalvo Accessibility Education and Training Specialist W3C/WAI
Received on Monday, 18 January 2021 15:14:29 UTC