- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 13:26:52 +0200
- To: Daniel Montalvo <dmontalvo@w3.org>, public-wai-curricula@w3.org
Hi Daniel, I personally like how you provide the learning outcomes for Module 1, yet I also like the mappings to the WCAG Success Criteria. I wonder if it is worthwhile to put the corresponding SCs in brackets after each learning outcome (eg. "Markup the different sections of a web page (SC 1.3.1)"), or to list all corresponding SCs in another sections right after learning outcomes (eg. "SCs related to this module")? Best, Shadi On 28/04/2020 13:02, Daniel Montalvo wrote: > Hey Howard, Stella, Shadi, > > We are not having a teleconference today. It took me a bit more time > than expected to implement last week’s feedback on learning outcomes for > module 1 and I could not build an agenda with enough time for you to be > prepared for the discussion. I invite you to use the scheduled > teleconference time to go through the questions below. You can answer to > this email with your views on them, ideally by Thursday EOB. > > Please find the current draft at > https://wai-curricula.netlify.app/curricula/developing-accessible-content/ > > * How to include success criteria in learning outcomes. In module 1, > success criteria are not mentioned explicitly but they are tied to > each of the learning outcomes. In other modules, they are listed all > together in a specific learning outcome that talks about analyzing > (or determining) if these success criteria are met (which may seem a > bit disconnected. I plan not to mention them but make sure each > learning outcome that we use covers at least a success criterion, > i.e., following the approach in module 1. Do you have further > thoughts about this approach? > * Making learning outcomes more specific -- Based on your feedback > that learning outcomes were too general, I have detailed learning > outcomes more. But details can be provided in different ways. In > module 1, I have qualified the outcomes, but specific techniques are > not mentioned at a module level. However, in the rest of the modules > there are specific mentions to techniques at a module level, which > may overlap with learning outcomes for topic. My plans are to > qualify the outcomes at a module level and dive into specific > techniques in teaching ideas and topics to teach as we do now in > module 1. This leaves us room for the details of specific techniques > in topics to teach sections. Do you have further thoughts about this > approach? > * Use of "Understand" is often considered too passive a verb to be use > in learning outcomes. However, there is also literature that > introduces its use within the cognitive domain, revising the Bloom's > taxonomy. Some examples of our use are: > “Understand how different assistive technology users orient and > navigate web pages”. > “Understand how several groups of users interact with navigational > elements”. > “Understand how several groups of users access information contained > in graphical elements”. > “Understand various strategies for users to navigate and process > information presented in tables”. > “Understand how some users navigate, fill in, and perceive > information from form fields”. > We previously had “recognize”, and we could have something like > “Acknowledge”, “Familiarize with”, “Become familiar with” or “get > acquainted with”. I see all of these examples as different ways to > actually mean understand, so I would mildly go for “understand”. Do > you suggest other phrasings of these sentences [to avoid using the > term understand]? > > Thanks. > > Best. > > Daniel Montalvo > > Accessibility Education and Training Specialist > > W3C/WAI > > *From:* Howard Kramer <howard.kramer@colorado.edu> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2020 5:25 AM > *To:* Daniel Montalvo <dmontalvo@w3.org>; public-wai-curricula@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: WAI Curricula Task Force Meeting April 21 > > Are we having a meeting on Tuesday? I haven't seen anything. > > -Howard > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*Daniel Montalvo <dmontalvo@w3.org> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 21, 2020 7:20 AM > *To:* public-wai-curricula@w3.org <public-wai-curricula@w3.org> > *Subject:* WAI Curricula Task Force Meeting April 21 > > Hello all: > > Today we are going to have another of our weekly meetings. > > Please use this phone bridge for the call: > > - > > https://mit.zoom.us/j/108109976 > > Password: curricula > > An agenda follows: > > # Discussing survey results > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/wai-curricula-tf-learning-outcomes-revie/results > > * Changing scope of learning objectives for the sub bullets under > https://wai-curricula.netlify.com/curricula/developing-accessible-content/ > <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1sXDQZu4yC4lrdWXnifKr_bkHmWeQXDNtd0IZVxC4sYlRZQYaSXR0NSX682P9NvN27X3567Bu7QQMqaankAnjmfsvDSRmOjROsnCloAWylArP5lUQO5_gS6kJgXRZyx6oMYKQWgY4ebq68a82AZj4d6CxNMhhMx0_bxDx0iTqRH8Nsud114EijWKElqUswClj5A3VOsTM1DCNXQMksc1IAlFdFaOR4JV0i_QtilJXvvOMMRWaDhyQFTtv7a9vkiqdXtipzo-F4T-rpmP1evw1aEfdlNCUTEgtxEBrn9ZgmIDLA-hVZHjMjlLHEYjqB5aS0bnOMTAEmvFlT4D4b5v2ii5SXQjTPtBjFs2wB6gLP64JOGHHAx5lyQe061kEUI84OW6RYxZHiUSqkSrqYseI20_M8wK6IoD9hTrLoTAyTFr6PaXC7D5WtGvz0vg-0VFeq9dQ5T5DaVUi_nxKy8rt_A/https%3A%2F%2Fwai-curricula.netlify.com%2Fcurricula%2Fdeveloping-accessible-content%2F>. > Making reference to further modules and topics instead of types of > disabilities and functionality. > * Removing learning outcome about focus and visibility techniques in > module 1. > * Adding learning outcomes specifically about labeling sections of > websites (tied to SC 1.3.1) in module 1. > * Adding references to language identification and language change. > * Tying each referenced success criteria to one or more learning > outcomes instead of referencing all success criteria at once. > > Thanks. > > Best. > > Daniel Montalvo > > Accessibility Education and Training Specialist > > W3C/WAI > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Monday, 4 May 2020 11:27:03 UTC