- From: <Anna.Zhuang@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:37:22 +0200
- To: <andrew@w3.org>, <public-wai-age@w3.org>
Dear all, I will not be able to participate in the call this time. Here are my comments: Before and after demo ===================== Main page --------- * Introduction needs to clearly state that it is not the intent to show functionally and visually different accessible and inaccessible pages but the intent is to emphasice that a page can be made accessible without changing its look and feel * Evaluation report is not "sample" it is just evaluation report. Also need to explain (perhaps in evaluation report itself) how this report was produces and compiled. Accessibility barriers page --------------------------- * This page should not have an introduction. This page is hierarchically under the main page that already has introduction and skeleton for the demo. * "About the sample pages" needs to be moved to the main page and placed under "Demonstration content" It is also good to articulate verbally what this content is, like barriers, sample pages and a report and then have a list of those links. I actually would move the description of sample pages to the main page but leave explanation about barriers in the barriers page. * I would modify the titles to read e.g. "barriers introduces in the sample main page" and so on for each demo page. So the page would look like: some descriptive text under the title, then "Barriers introduced in..." and a list of barriers with the links. The links to the demo pages are not absolutely necessary as they are already in the main page. And it is good to articulate at the beginning of the barrier page that all the links are actually to subcequent parts of a single report doc. Report itself ------------- Something definitely needs to be done to this report. It is along and hard to navigate document. Anna >-----Original Message----- >From: public-wai-age-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-wai-age-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ext Andrew Arch >Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 11:36 PM >To: public-wai-age@w3.org >Subject: WAI-AGE task force meeting - 28/Oct > > >Hello Task Force Members [1] > >Here are details for our next meeting: > >*NEXT MEETING*: > Date: 28-October-2008 (Tuesday) > Time: 15:30-17:00 CET (may be shorter) Check >http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html for your >local time. Please send regrets to the list if you will be absent. > >Last minutes: http://www.w3.org/2008/10/15-waiage-minutes.html > >Teleconference Bridge: +33.4.89.06.34.99 / +44.117.370.6152 / >+1.617.761.6200 >Teleconference code: 9243# (WAGE#) >IRC: Channel - #waiage; server - irc.w3.org; port - 6665 > >Scribe: Helle > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wai-age/teleconf.html#scribes >Instructions for minuting: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wai-age/teleconf.html#minuting > > >*AGENDA*: > >1. Welcome > - please send regrets to the list > >2. Before/After Demo update ><http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/Overview> > ># Finalise barriers to illustrate more clearly the needs of >older users. ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-age/2008OctDec/ 0025.html> >Other messages: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-age/2008OctDec/ > >Regards, Andrew >[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2008/wai-age-tf.html#participants > >-- >Dr Andrew Arch >Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist >W3C/ERCIM, Sophia Antipolis, France >Ph +33 (0)4 92 38 79 46 >www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/ > > >
Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 20:39:30 UTC