Re: Web Accessibility Business Case draft updates

first one: "ageing" should be used throughout.
second one: older technology [or mobile technology], just older [or mobile]
technology.
     discovering their relevance, perhaps "necessity" might be stronger than
"relevance"?
third, fourth, and fifth ones: no comments

I shouldn't have been surprised at what a great job you've done with this,
but it is up to your usual standards.

Love.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org> wrote:

>
> Hello all,
>
> As discussed during previous teleconferences, I have now updated the the
> documents for "Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your
> Organization" to add additional examples and discussion regarding older
> users, and to add WCAG 2.0 references:
> - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/Overview.html
>  - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/soc.html
>  - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/tech.html
>  - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/fin.html
>  - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/pol.html
>
> The changelog has also been updated:
> - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-bcase-update.html
>
> Please read these documents to see if we have sufficiently covered examples
> and issues that specifically relate to older people. Please send any
> comments or suggestions to the list for discussion and consideration.
>
> Regards, Andrew
> --
>
>
>