Re: FIRST DRAFT Agenda for the Process Call Wednesday 24 Mar 7am PDT

One question about the agenda inline.

On 3/22/2021 8:38 PM, Dave Singer wrote:
> Webex at <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2019May/0000.html>
>
> IRC is #w3process
>
> Log of prior meeting at <https://www.w3.org/2021/03/10-w3process-minutes.html>
>
> Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT 7AM PACIFIC. See <https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/w3process/calendar>
>
>
>
> Overall purpose: still trying to close down 2021
>
>
>
> 1) Assign scribe, etc.,
>
> 2) Agenda bash.
>
> 3) Agenda+ <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/Agenda%2B>
>
>    3.1) #509 Switching Tracks <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/509>
>
>    3.2) #511 Define minutes <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/511>, Pull #512 <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/512>
>      But see also
>     #322 What are the rules for where/how W3C publications are developed? <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/322>
>     #338 Decisions <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/338>
>
>    3.3) #312 Suspension / Removal for cause <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/312>
>      We seemed to settle on somewhat improved clarity here, and #432 was merged and closed, yet the D-F branch and our working P2021 copy and what’s proposed here all differ.

It would help me if someone could provide a more complete summary of 
what we are discussing.

I see that the P2021 label was removed.

Also the long discussion thread morphs into several issues.  I can't 
tell what the actual discussion is for tomorrow.

>
>    3.4) Editorial, but some controversy in the past, so decide:
>    #513 Keep or remove Note about delegation from CEO/Director to Team <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/513>
>
>    3.5) Maybe not for this year:
>
>    #310 (Director-free) TAG chair selection timing <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/310>
>    #313 (Director-free) Team-Appointed TAG Chair(s) <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/313>
>
>    #505 Define a role of "Alternate AC Rep" & enable them to perform AC duties when necessary <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/505>
>      Suggest we ask the team to give considerations of the easy, and binding, ways to do this?
>
>
> 4) 2021 ‘flagships’ and progress.
>
> 4.1) Tooling: #436 New section on tooling <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/436>
>
>     I suspect we are losing sight of both where we are and where are are going. Review and plan.
>
>     Overall, I think we are waiting on anything that PSIG members or PSIG wants to comment on, and a review from the AB on tooling, if we can land it.
>    
>   4.2) Registries.
>     I believe we have addressed survivability in what we wrote and we can close:
>       #330 Survivability of registries <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/330>
>
>     Time to start working on the Guide and closing:
>     #329 Guidance for registry creation <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/329>
>
>    4.3) Notes.
>       #501 Abandoning a Note <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/501>
>
> 5) Clean up our Pull Requests (Editor to guide us?) <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pulls>
>
> #299 Any decision can be objected to
> #401 Proposes changes to wide/horizontal review; lots of discussion, what can we land?
> #433 Simplify the text on liaisons. Does this go back to the AB, as it touches on members that are consortia (maybe they should be liaisons with a specific WG?)
> #434 (face to face) Meetings of new groups are 8 weeks from charter approval
>
>
> 6) Are we on for seeing the end of P2021?
>     6.1) Remaining P2021 Priority issues:
>      Can we close this?
>       #130 Enumerate the requirements for wide review <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/130>
>
>      Propose we leave this open and continue to ask ‘how?’:
>       #356 Streamlining the Process Document <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/356>
>
>     Review hanging paragraphs and make sure they are harmless, and simplify sections that have only one subsection:
>       #424 Eliminate 'hanging paragraphs' <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/424>
>
>     Provide a better ‘roadmap’ in the Introduction:
>       #423 Section 1 (Introduction) should help navigate the document <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/423>
>         Volunteer?
>
>     6.2) Cherry-picked from the P2021 Milestone:
>        Also from AC Review
>        #347  Streamlining horizontal reviews
>        #103  Should the process allow REC->WD transition directly?
>
>        #60    Clarify the voting process AC-review (we’re never going to have a document that reflects reality, this is here just as a joke so we can all laugh or cry)
>
> 7) Issues that  the AC gave us last time we asked for a review; we should probably try to clean up?
>
> <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/AC-review>
>
>
> The usual closers:
>
> 8) Next meeting.  14 April <https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/w3process/calendar#card-89dd2215-93d3-4af8-971c-931529bc227d-20210414T070000>
>
> 8) Any other business.
>
>
> David Singer
> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple
>
> singer@apple.com
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2021 01:17:45 UTC