FIRST DRAFT Agenda for the Process Call Wednesday 10 Mar 7am PDT

Webex at <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2019May/0000.html>

IRC is #w3process

Log of prior meeting at <https://www.w3.org/2021/02/24-w3process-minutes.html>

Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT 7AM PACIFIC.



Overall purpose: still trying to close down 2021



1) Assign scribe, etc.,

2) Agenda bash. 

3) The Four Horsemen of the 2021 Process. Where are we, where are we going, and how do we get from here to there?

  3.1) Tooling Policy. AB CfC has closed. <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/436>

      I think we can settle on
      * should for all except retention of records
      * must for retention of records
      * say, for the section “it is a responsibility of the team contact to ensure these rules are followed, and to bring any group not in compliance, into compliance, as soon as possible.”
      * say on the retention of records  “The (temporary) lack of a backup does not, by itself, make a decision or revision invalid.”

  3.2) Recording meetings. see <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/334#issuecomment-793173149>

  3.3) Registries. Florian has a pull for the base text and a separate commit for the separate publication.

  3.4) Separate track for Notes, in place, including W3C Statements. see <https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Drafts/#note-track>

4) Issues that  the AC gave us last time we asked for a review; we should probably try to clean up?

<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/AC-review>

5) Process 2021, The Milestone <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/milestone/6> (long list)

P2021 Priority, shorter list <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/P2021%3A%20Priority>

#130 on enumerating the requirements for Wide Review. Covered well enough, so close? See also <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/401>

(all else is Registries etc. and covered elsewhere) 


6) Other Pull Requests (other than agenda+, Needs AB Feedback, or a priority)

#299 Any decision can be objected to
#401 Proposes changes to wide/horizontal review; lots of discussion, what can we land?
#433 Simplify the text on liaisons. Does this go back to the AB, as it touches on members that are consortia (maybe they should be liaisons with a specific WG?)
#434 (face to face) Meetings of new groups are 8 weeks from charter approval
#485 possible missing link (editorial)


The usual closers:

7) Next meeting.  24 March

8) Any other business.


David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple

singer@apple.com

Received on Monday, 8 March 2021 23:42:37 UTC