- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 16:46:43 -0700
- To: W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Colleagues, we have very few comments and issues from informal AC review. We should address them and get the Process document out for formal ballot and acceptance. Soon I would like to get consensus on the adjusted process. But before that I want to check: * I think we should consider a minor edit to address #552, Archiving discussion attachments <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/552>. Elika and I have provided some ideas, other thoughts welcome, * We should iterate on #541 Clarification about horizontal review <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/541> and merge it. But I don’t think we have quite landed. Help, please? * I bungled and remembered accessibility for products and missed it for tools. We have two pull requests to address this, ahem, oversight, and I think that the editor prefers #539: #539 Minimal edit to put emphasis on people with disabilities rather than cost for tooling accessibility <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/539> #538 Explicitly require tools be accessible to people with disability <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/538> We should iterate on #539 and merge it also. That’s it. None of these are hard. Can you help us refine and land them? Ideally we complete so we can conclude we’re done at next week’s meeting 14th. In fact, I have a conflict for that meeting so would prefer we conclude async and offline! We should be able to sort out three minor edits in a week, I think. Thanks David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple singer@apple.com
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2021 23:47:47 UTC