Process CG, proposals to address and close

Hi

The editors and I went through the entire repository, to clean up issues. Some were closed as addressed, and a few were transferred to the AB as being out of our scope.

Of the remainder, 

1. we picked a few that we feel should be addressed in the next revision, in ADDITION to Director-free:

<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/P2022%20Proposed%20to%20address>

(#518 was already accepted to address)

2. we picked a lot that we believe should be closed no action (or no further action):

<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/P2022%20Proposed%20to%20close>

The remaining stay open as needing addressing some time, of course. The editors hope to address the editorials:

<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/Type%3A%20Editorial%20improvements>

At the next meeting, I intend to get agreement on the set we *want* to address in P2022, and label as P2022, and in the absence of objection, to close those labeled as proposed to close.

So, you might like to scan the issues under these labels and check to see if you would take any out; and (more work) the rest of the repo to see if you would like to propose adding any in.

Please don’t *remove* these labels from any issue; comment on them if you disagree with the label.

If you want to add proposed to address/close to any issue, please (a) add the label AND (b) send email to the group saying that you did it, with issue numbers and/or URLs, so we can all consider whether we agree.

Thanks


David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple

singer@apple.com

Received on Monday, 16 August 2021 20:11:28 UTC