W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > January 2020

RE: Agenda for the Process Call Wednesday 29th January 7am PDT

From: Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:08:47 +0000
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BL0PR02MB48200C80B67BA0262A7C2C15D5050@BL0PR02MB4820.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
I will attend, but I expect to be about 15 minutes late.

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead

-----Original Message-----
From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> 
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 7:31 PM
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Subject: Re: Agenda for the Process Call Wednesday 29th January 7am PDT

On 1/28/20 1:24 PM, David Singer wrote:
> Apologies for not sending a draft for critique.
> 1) Assign scribe, etc.,
> 2) Agenda bash. [...]

Let's start by going through these open PRs and hopefully approving them:
Propose removing CR reference to Last Call

Drop the "Edited" Recommendation moniker

Eliminate the distinction between X-RECs and REC

I think you're missing the one major issue we need to discuss, and were scheduled to discuss, which is Registries. Adding relevant links below:

Here is the main issue on the topic, with the latest comment by Florian summarizing the diffs between the two proposals on the table (one in the wiki, one as Process PR):


Here is the sub-issue about where to publish them:

Here is sub-issue about whether the registry tables and their definitions should be in the same publication or not, latest comment by Florian:

Please try to read up on the materials above so we can discuss. Thanks~


Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2020 12:08:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 29 January 2020 12:08:53 UTC