- From: Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:08:47 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
I will attend, but I expect to be about 15 minutes late. Tzviya Siegman Information Standards Lead Wiley 201-748-6884 tsiegman@wiley.com -----Original Message----- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 7:31 PM To: public-w3process@w3.org Subject: Re: Agenda for the Process Call Wednesday 29th January 7am PDT On 1/28/20 1:24 PM, David Singer wrote: > Apologies for not sending a draft for critique. > > 1) Assign scribe, etc., > > 2) Agenda bash. [...] Let's start by going through these open PRs and hopefully approving them: Propose removing CR reference to Last Call https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/363 Drop the "Edited" Recommendation moniker https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/364 Eliminate the distinction between X-RECs and REC https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/365 I think you're missing the one major issue we need to discuss, and were scheduled to discuss, which is Registries. Adding relevant links below: Here is the main issue on the topic, with the latest comment by Florian summarizing the diffs between the two proposals on the table (one in the wiki, one as Process PR): https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/168#issuecomment-577174792 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2020Jan/att-0007/regdiff.html Here is the sub-issue about where to publish them: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/353 Here is sub-issue about whether the registry tables and their definitions should be in the same publication or not, latest comment by Florian: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/354#issuecomment-577923943 Please try to read up on the materials above so we can discuss. Thanks~ ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2020 12:08:51 UTC