Re: Process CG Call for Consensus (CfC), responses needed

+1 to moving forward

Onward!
--Wendy

On 2/13/20 4:26 PM, David Singer wrote:
> In the last call, those on the call had consensus that the document at <https://w3c.github.io/w3process/> is ready for the next steps and that the ProcessCG has taken it as far as it can.
> 
> The next steps are
> * similar AB consensus at the upcoming AB face-to-face 25-27 feb
> * wider review by the AC in March
> * presentation to the AC at the upcoming Seoul meeting, discussion
> * adoption by the AC online (WBS)
> 
> This is a formal Call for Consensus supporting the decision on the call: the Process CG sends it to the AB for the next steps.
> 
> If you AGREE, please respond; expressions of support help us gauge the level of support.
> 
> If you DISAGREE and believe that the ProcessCG is not done or the document should not advance as-is, you MUST respond to this email to have any impact (the default is to assume indifference or assent).
> 
> The response MUST indicate +1/-1, or support/oppose the CfC, to be used.
> 
> The deadline to respond is one week, end of business Friday the 21st Feb. (Before the AB meeting).
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> 
> 


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office)
Strategy Lead and Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
https://wendy.seltzer.org/        +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)

Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2020 13:42:13 UTC