- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:24:45 -0400
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 9/24/2019 4:20 PM, David Singer wrote: > I apologize for the late notice. After some analysis, and brief discussion with Jeff, I don’t think a process call tomorrow would be productive. Look for announcements and agendas for the next call. I may have to delay to the 16th or find a substitute for the 9th, as I have a conflict (MPEG) that week. regrets from me for the 9th, as well. > > No call tomorrow. > > * * * > > If I look at an agenda in general, nothing stands out as both needing, and being ready for, in-call discussion: > > tagged agenda+ : 0 pull requests, 1 issue (openstand principles); > > 4 2020 milestones: <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+assignee%3A*> > registries, living standards, how charter review comments are handled, what are ’substantive changes’ for charter reviews > > there are 7 new issues that are not director-free, and not living standards and not registries > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3Adirector-free+> > > none need call discussion now, IMHO > > I don’t see much in the 12 getting attention recently (overlaps the previous list): > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+updated%3A%3E2019-05-22+-label%3A%22Needs+AB+Feedback%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3Adirector-free+> > > * * * > > Opinions follow, and suggestions for next steps. > > I think we (W3C, AB, Process CG) need to develop/finalize, post-TPAC and maybe post-AC survey: > > * what’s the direction for Living Standards? > a) ever* where * is one or more of green, blue, teal, etc.? > > * what’s the resolution of the questions on Registries? > b) what must be, may be, or must not be, published together? > c) do we need to insist on the copy to /TR? (I’ve asked Tantek to file this as an issue as he raised it at TPAC) > > * what to do with the feedback from TPAC on Director-free > d) The TAG appointment process (my gut tells me that this is still a bit soft) > e) The W3C Council > > And that this is all AB-level, policy, questions, and the Process CG is poorly suited and attended to handle these. I think we need the champions to boil this down to report/analysis/recommendation: > > * Philippe and Elika on living standards > * Florian on Director-free > * Myself on Registries > > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2019 20:24:47 UTC