DRAFT-1 agenda for the Process Call Wednesday 23rd Oct 7am PDT, REPLY APPRECIATED

I am in Korea, and Philippe is in China. It’ll be 11pm for me. I hope I make it.

**** If know you can and would make it, or conversely can’t and won’t, please reply and confirm or regret; we can asses then whether we’ll have a productive call. Thanks. ****




Webex at <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2019May/0000.html>

IRC is #w3process

Log of prior meeting at <https://www.w3.org/2019/09/11-w3process-minutes.html>


Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT 7AM PACIFIC



1) Assign scribe, etc.,

2) Registries and Living Standards.

2.1) Tantek raised a Registry issue at TPAC, which I hd previously raised and then dropped in the interests of making progress. he has not (yet) filed it as an issue. Update from the chair (me).

2.2) Update on where we are with Living Standards? PLH/Jeff/Elika/someone?


3) Editorials, and (Other) Pull Requests and Issues tagged Agenda+

3.1) Pull Requests: <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3AAgenda%2B>

Make it clear than any decision can be objected to <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/299>
[Registries handled above]

3.2) Issues:   <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAgenda%2B+>

New, need to decide how to proceed: add references to "Open Stand" principles #325 <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/325>

3.3) Editorials: we still need to make progress on the meaning of Discontinued, and clearer wording for transitions to superseded/obsolete. They are not tagged agenda+

What does the document status "discontinued" mean? #262 <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/262>
  — we discussed before
provide clearer/common wording for transitions to Obsolete/Superseded status #141<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/141>
 — Chris Wilson update?

4) Review of 2020 milestone; who has the action, where are we going, what’s next? Do we expect/hope/intend to finish these in P2020 or should we start slipping them?

4.1) assigned to someone, please be prepared to give any needed updates (briefly), or if you are blocked by something, explain what it is so we can unblock you:
<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+assignee%3A*>

I think we need to decide what the plan is on:

Substantive changes undefined for Charter and Process reviews <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/28>
Define charter review process to require addressing comments as in CR transitions <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182>


4.2) unassigned; none. <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+no%3Aassignee+>

5) new issues and updates. 

5.1) new since prior check: <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+>
There are many; I don’t intend to list them here. 

If we reduce to those not either (a) evergreen or (b) director-free, and not (c) Agenda+, we have 9:
 <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+created%3A%3E2019-03-13+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-label%3Adirector-free+>

It’s time to triage them. I’d like to draw particular attention to:

Recording of meetings <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/334>
TAG and AB should be able to formally review charters <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/328>
Community and Business Groups <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/326>
Do we need a lighter-weight process for superseding when it's "obvious”? <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/324>

I’d like to encourage people to review them, and tag Agenda+ any that we could progress, or dispose of. Please?


5.2) updated but not any of:
 Process2020 milestone 
 nor Evergreen
 nor director-free 
 nor Agenda+ 
 not assigned to the AB (Needs AB Feedback)
<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+updated%3A%3E2019-05-22+-label%3A%22Needs+AB+Feedback%22+-label%3AAgenda%2B+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22+-label%3AEvergreen+-label%3Adirector-free+>

I’d like to encourage people to review them, and tag Agenda+ any that we could progress, or dispose of. Please?


6) If we have time, Assigned, but not on the 2020 milestone (cherry-pick, if people have updates or questions for us):

<https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aopen+assignee%3A*+-milestone%3A%22Process+2020%22>

Some of these date from 2017. Surely time to clean out?

The usual closers:

7) Next meeting. formally Wed Sept 25th, week after TPAC. I assume we’ll meet and de-brief.

8) Any other business.






David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2019 07:13:07 UTC