- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 22:07:56 -0400
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, W3C Process CG <public-w3process@w3.org>
- Cc: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
#271, #272, and #273 all seem ripe for discussion. Perhaps Mike added them after your email was sent. I'm trying to recall. I believe that we said we were going to create a branch of the process document with Evergreen. Has that happened yet? It would be good to get that done before the meeting on the 22nd. Last week, on issue #79, PLH posted an impressive list of specs that have some interest in Evergreen. I took that as a call to action; there is a real need that we should get addressed in Process 2020. Accordingly, I think we should have some discussion about what actions we will take to get CG consensus on these process mods. Similarly, perhaps Wendy can give an update on PSIG discussions on Evergreen PP. Jeff On 5/17/2019 5:46 PM, David Singer wrote: > Hi guys > > next call is on Wednesday 22nd. The primary focus will be on ES and Registries, I think. We have only one issue (ES) tagged Agenda+ (I’ll soon add Registries). > > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/Agenda%2B> > > > You might scan the issues and see whether you can move the conversations along offline, and tag Agenda+ on issues that would benefit from a declaration of consensus, or from verbal discussion. > > <https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues> > > > I’ll do an initial agenda on Monday… > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > >
Received on Sunday, 19 May 2019 02:08:00 UTC