W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > June 2016

Re: Revising 7.2 Appeal by Advisory Committee Representatives (was Re; Agenda Process Document ...)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:44:30 +0200
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <ab2778f8-e9c9-52ed-9741-4fce1a67fed2@disruptive-innovations.com>
On 20/06/2016 21:54, Carr, Wayne wrote:

> We don't need to put in the Process document exactly how the Team gets the information from the AC.  They can use a mail list, or an online form, or however they tell the AC how to indicate they support the request to have an AC vote on the appeal.  We don't need to have that level of detail in the Process document.

Wow. We're discussing an Appeal process and you think such a lose
way of doing things would not attract, with a precise 5% threshold,
a deep and fine review? I am thinking exactly the contrary, we're
dealing here with one of our worst possible scenarios and we have
to fence it off _very_ precisely to avoid any contestation.

Received on Monday, 20 June 2016 20:44:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 20 June 2016 20:44:57 UTC