Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force on Webex Monday, 11 January 2015

Steve,

As a reminder (my email to you on 13 December), Mike, David, Chaals, and 
I will be at an AB in Hawaii.  As this meeting will be at 6AM Hawaii 
time, I'm not sure what participation you will get.

Other comments in-line.

Jeff

On 1/6/2016 6:31 PM, Stephen Zilles wrote:
>
> The call is on Monday, 11 January 2015 at 16:00-17:00 UTC 
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=08&day=26&year=2014&hour=14&min=00&sec=0&p1=0>
> (Note this is Columbus Day in the United States)
>

Not really.

> *Webex Information (Note change of Telcon site)*
>
> Dial-in: +1-617-324-0000
>
> Webex does not allow meeting codes to be publicly posted, see the “The 
> Process” previously distributed.
>
> Meeting password: process
>
> URL to join meeting: 
> https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=mbea8090287ebcf2d2cbf4b3a2b15dda9
>
> This meeting is now monthly, has moved to Monday and is held one hour 
> later than before
>
> For residents of other (typical) time zones the start times were:
>
> Pacific:  8:00
>
> Eastern US: 11:00
>
> Central Europe: 17:00
>
> Japan: 01:00
>
> The purpose of these meetings has been to agree on the resolution of 
> open issues, close them where possible or assign actions to move 
> toward closure.
>
> Agenda:
>
> 1.Review Open Action Items
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/open
>
> 2.Discuss recent request from Carine Bournez re: editorial updates to CRs
>
> See: 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2016Jan/0002.html
>
> 3.Prioritize near term work based on
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Nov/0000.html
>
> 4.Issue-163 Update of Members that are Consortia themselves
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Sep/0008.html
>

My recollection was that you had the action to finalize with Alan. Has 
that happened?

> 5.Discuss Issues and Proposals for “Appeals” Issues
> Toward the end of the process of creating Process 2015, a number of 
> issues related to "appeals" in the W3C process surfaced. At that time, 
> there seemed to be too little time to appropriately address the issues 
> with the care the seem to be needed. Now that Process 2015 is in 
> Review, it is time to start on revisions for Process 2016 and the 
> "appeals" issues seem like a good place to start. The issues:
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/164
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/165
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/166
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/167
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/7
>
> and the proposal:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Jul/0030.html
>
> Note: there have been zero comments on the text of the proposal. Does 
> this mean it is OK as is?
>

I don't really understand this question.  I sent several emails in 
September objecting to the breadth of the proposal and asking what 
problem we are trying to solve.  I don't recall seeing that discussed or 
answered.
>
> 6.Replacement figures for sections 6.1.1 and 6.7
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Oct/0000.html
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Oct/0001.html
>
> 7.Possible Issues related to Chartering Working Groups
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Sep/0013.html
>
> 8.Choose next set of topics to pursue
>
> 9.Review other Open and Raised Issues
> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/
>
> 10.Any Other Business
>
> Steve Zilles
>
> Chair, Process Document Task Force
>